Correspondence, 1934

10/2/34-10/30/34; Memo from Edwin S. Smith to Garrison and Millis, includes a questionaire to be sent to industrial boards; from Robert E. Watts (General Counsel, NLRB) to the Attorney General submitting the Houde Case for review; memo regarding the status of strikers as employees, includes information relevant to Houde case; memo on public reaction to the Houde decision (majority rule in collective bargaining); from T.F.E. (?) to the Board about the Detroit Street Railway case; from Harry Millis to Roy C. Jacobson (Director, Denver Regional Board) concerning pay of panel members; from Stephen Early (Assistant Secretary to the President) to Garrison confirming the President's acceptance of his resignation; from Millis to Garrison (Dean, The Law School, University of Wisconsin) about offering Scrinshaw the Associate Directorship of the Milwaukee office; from Elisha Hanson (Attorney for the San Francisco Call-Bulletin) to Edwin S. Smith opposing NLRB jurisdiction in the Jennings controversy, and recommemding the case be turned over to the Newspaper Industrial Board; from Harold M. Stephens (Assistant Attorney General) to Robert Watts (Special Counsel, NLRB) on Houde Engineering case,(enclosure no. 381814 unattached); from Stanley Mathewson (Director, Cincinnati Regional Labor Board) to Benedict Wolf about the American Rolling Mill Co.